< Back

ITA

Bull/Bear sentiment by day

ITA Mentioned Tweets

B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/24/2026, 7:01:29 PM
View on X >
美国福特级航母在干洗房着火以后发现更多系统漏洞,可能不得不进入停役状态。 这使得美国能在中东部署的力量更加捉襟见肘。
$ITANeutral
L
@labubu_trader
userId: 54811865
3/24/2026, 4:04:46 PM
View on X >
My focus post the war will be 🦞 basket and SpaceX supply chain basket. Just saw Mr @citrini also recommended their basket(AKAM/FSLY/NET) today. https://t.co/qkVgcct6DW
$ITABull
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/18/2026, 6:58:20 AM
View on X >
今天辞职引起轩然大波的的美国反恐中心主任Joe Kent,是一名曾被派往海外执行 11 次战斗任务的退伍特种兵,更是一名“金星家属”(Gold Star husband)。他的妻子香农(Shannon Kent)于 2019 年在叙利亚的自杀式炸弹袭击中丧生。他在信中甚至将那场导致妻子丧生的战争也归咎于以色列,并表示他绝对无法在良心上支持把下一代美国年轻人送去打一场“对美国人民毫无益处”的战争。 乔·肯特在过去几年(包括他两次在华盛顿州竞选国会议员时)的核心政治标签,就是极端的“美国优先”和反干涉主义。他极度厌恶美国在中东陷入“无休止的战争”。 肯特最初愿意加入特朗普政府,是因为特朗普在第一任期内曾主张从叙利亚等地撤军,避免全面战争。肯特以为特朗普会继续坚持这种不卷入海外冲突的路线。但随着今年(2026年)2月底美军对伊朗发动全面战争,这场冲突彻底触碰了肯特作为“孤立主义者”和“丧妻老兵”的绝对红线。 作为反恐中心主任,他看到了最核心的情报。当他发现高层决策(发动战争)与他看到的情报(伊朗无迫在眉睫的威胁)严重背离,且认为决策被外部势力(以色列)绑架时,他选择不再妥协,直接掀桌子走人。 Kent的离开是MAGA阵营的一次重大分裂,其核心的孤立主义和犹太金主出现了根本性的分歧,同时也是军方对特朗普投下的不信任票。
$ITANeutral
S
@ShanghaoJin
userId: 858124064476479500
3/18/2026, 3:52:21 AM
View on X >
RT @ShanghaoJin: Chamberlain虽然政策绥靖,但他至少其实清楚知道德国威胁。至少启动了Shadow Factory Scheme,大规模动员了军工产能 欧美左派面对一个一天已经能产1万架无人机的潜在对手,天真到连动员的意愿、想法都没有 天天在哭巴勒斯…
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/17/2026, 5:29:47 PM
View on X >
特朗普说美国不再需要北约了。
$ITABear
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/14/2026, 6:31:29 PM
View on X >
美国已经摧毁了伊朗的所有军事能力,除了导弹、无人机、布雷船、火箭弹、集束弹、潜艇、潜在核武器等等。
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/13/2026, 7:02:56 PM
View on X >
美国抽调日本守军前往中东,东亚美军基地为之一空。 有一种可能,就是美国从来没有打算为了日本韩国这些远在千里之外的国家和中国交战。最重要的作用还是威慑和收钱。 必要的时候还得靠自己哦。
$ITABull
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/13/2026, 2:56:03 AM
View on X >
明早八点,美国战争部将举行美以军事行动的新闻发布会。 可以TACO一下吗😭
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/12/2026, 10:58:16 PM
View on X >
世界上最强大的航母差点毁于一场随机的大火,刚刚取得击毁3架F15最佳战绩的科威特小小紧张了一下。 https://t.co/NfmxOVrqQt
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/12/2026, 6:28:26 AM
View on X >
那些赞成美国误炸小学不应该道歉追责的人,我想问你一句。如果有一天美国来帮助中国建立民主制度,误炸了你在香港、上海、北京或者其他地方的学校,炸死了你女儿或者儿子,你可以接受吗? 砸死你或者你爸爸妈妈或者妻子可以接受吗? 所以我们现在要求这些有精确制导武器又爱好管其他国闲事的美国,炸得准一点,要为乱炸负人道主义责任,有问题吗? 我觉得没有问题。有问题的在于这个炸弹究竟是谁扔的,目前的大多数证据都表明是美国。
$ITANeutral
S
@ShanghaoJin
userId: 858124064476479500
3/12/2026, 1:05:31 AM
View on X >
确实如此~~美军长期作战思维是数量质量双优势碾压 如果换在台海他们会遇上一个月生产100万台无人机、1万枚超音速导弹的对手。那些Thaad都不够看 理解Andrill创始人Luckey说的了吗? 美国目前的军事生产力和工业基础,已让美军无法用熟悉的“双压制”应对高强度的大国冲突了
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/11/2026, 6:08:39 PM
View on X >
FBI声称伊朗可能对远在2万公里外的加利福尼亚州发动无人机袭击。 大家不要惊慌!如果惊慌的话可以把房子半价卖给我🤤
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/10/2026, 8:27:46 PM
View on X >
韩国媒体拍到美军正在把萨德和爱国者防空系统拆除。 这二位狂喜 https://t.co/gN9wBGBrzb
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/10/2026, 2:34:16 PM
View on X >
美国在韩国防空的导弹萨德和爱国者全部被搬空。
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/4/2026, 5:37:16 PM
View on X >
一不小心又花了500亿美元在以色列身上。超过其全年军费了。 美国人花在保护以色列的钱比以色列花在保护自己的钱还多。
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/3/2026, 11:05:12 PM
View on X >
@grok 西班牙拒绝美国使用其领土的军事基地进攻伊朗是否违反了其作为盟友的义务?美国以此为理由惩罚提供领土作为军事基地的国家是否会有什么影响?
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/3/2026, 3:42:08 AM
View on X >
光是防御伊朗,在战前就几乎搬空美国以外的所有防空系统。在中国附近只剩下一个萨德。 但是美国声称其最大的敌人是中国!
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/3/2026, 1:20:16 AM
View on X >
美国突然意识到以前伊朗以前打人前都会提前通知的,那才是最好的防空系统😭 https://t.co/7DatTBrr5w
$ITABull
L
@labubu_trader
userId: 54811865
3/2/2026, 11:17:43 PM
View on X >
Still holding EWU but no longer EWG (cut last week). Started longing some EU defense and uranium miners today. As Macron finally realized Europe needs to be defended by Europeans not by Americans
$ITABull
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/2/2026, 6:16:02 AM
View on X >
飞行员不会轻易弹射出舱,因为弹射以后作为飞行员的人生可能就彻底结束了。因为这个过程会受到严重的身体以及心理的创伤。几十G的加速度,可能会严重骨折甚至瘫痪。
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/2/2026, 6:03:45 AM
View on X >
F15出现坠毁,估计是出故障了不是被打中了。
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/2/2026, 12:15:27 AM
View on X >
Musk声明,即使是StarLink也不可用于武器制导,而应使用由美国国防部管理的另一套系统。
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/1/2026, 6:49:43 PM
View on X >
目前的逻辑是这样: 伊朗封锁霍尔木兹—&gt;石油价格暴涨—&gt;市场担忧CPI上升—&gt;市场担忧降息减缓—&gt;科技股受到冲击 所以要等这一波恐慌过去,我们还是要专注于GTC前苹果产品发布、TSM月报等关键事情。这些是确定的交易,石油黄金和军火是不确定的交易。 https://t.co/d01yMHsOOS
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
3/1/2026, 6:12:51 PM
View on X >
🚨 刚刚!伊朗向美军“林肯号”航母发射4枚弹道导弹! 伊朗宣称: 导弹精准命中,航母已经出现严重损毁! 美军第一反应: “没有任何导弹击中,一切功能正常” 这波操作到底谁在说谎?👀 不过信息战在战争中很重要,但是美方可能更可信。 #伊朗 #林肯号 #美伊冲突 #航母
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
2/28/2026, 6:31:51 AM
View on X >
Claude虽然失去了2亿的军用订单,但是获得了大量支持。
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
2/19/2026, 6:30:08 PM
View on X >
军火和石油真的还有买的必要吗? 目前来说,其实只有不确定的时候,这两个东西才会上涨,一旦美国真的出手,反而会大跌。 所以如果你押注Trump要继续拖搞不确定性,那就可以入手,否则的话就要很小心。 特别是期货,玩期货的人是我见过最冷酷无情的机器,消息出来的一秒,价格就立刻爆炸了。
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
2/13/2026, 10:11:45 PM
View on X >
SpaceX很快会正式宣布IPO
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
1/31/2026, 7:12:28 AM
View on X >
阿耳忒弥斯发射从2/6推迟到2/8
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
1/28/2026, 3:48:03 PM
View on X >
SpaceX 以1.5万亿美元市值融资500亿美元 。 Pre IPO
$ITANeutral
B
@Balder13946731
userId: 1814168337540436000
1/21/2026, 9:43:06 PM
View on X >
Elon is trying to make SpaceX IPO before July 2026. https://t.co/uAdMFbryeQ
$ITANeutral
C
@commonsenseplay
userId: 1867041965172461600
1/16/2026, 8:06:50 PM
View on X >
Boeing Stock Review: Boeing ( $BA ) is no longer a “planes” story. Under new management It’s a trust and cash flow story… with a defense budget tailwind recently announced by a Trump that could be huge if it actually gets enacted. What changed recently (and why the tape’s been strong):
- Boeing just printed a real operational bounce in 2025: 600 commercial deliveries (best since 2018) and 131 defense deliveries. - Breakdown: 447x 737, 88x 787, 35x 777, 30x 767 on the commercial side. That’s not “fixed” - but it is progress that customers can see. Deliveries are the only KPI that pays the bills in Boeings core business, which is a complete duopoly between them and Airbus. At the same time, demand is not the issue: - Boeing logged 1,173 net orders in 2025, beating Airbus on orders (even though Airbus still beat them on deliveries: 793 vs 600). The real unlock is the regulator relationship:
- The FAA lifted Boeing’s 737 MAX production cap to 42 per month (from 38), after intense oversight post‑Alaska door‑plug incident. That’s the closest thing you’ll get to a “trust signal” from the only party that matters. - If you’re underwriting $BA, you’re underwriting that Boeing can scale rates without triggering another quality event and another clampdown. CEO / management quality (the bull argument is mostly “Ortberg is the adult”):
- Kelly Ortberg, who I personally have huge respect for, inherited a mess and has been doing the unsexy turnaround work: stabilize operations, prioritize quality, and rebuild the chain of control. Two concrete “operator” moves stand out to me: 1. Labor normalization: the big machinist strike ended after ~7 weeks via a ratified contract, and the defense side also dealt with a St. Louis strike that halted F‑15EX production (deliveries later resumed). Boeing needed factories running, not constant negative headlines. https://t.co/4puBmFqfgo chain control: Boeing brought Spirit AeroSystems back in-house($4.7B equity / ~$8.3B including debt) to reduce the “blame the supplier” loop and tighten quality on core structures. Balance sheet focus: Ortberg has also been pruning non-core assets (e.g., selling big parts of the digital aviation unit to Thoma Bravo) -  basically: “we’re building airplanes again, not running a conglomerate.” Before Otberg Boeing were spreading themselves far too thin, this was the right move! Also side note - Ortberg relocate to be actually onsite at their sites, something we are seeing less and less these days! Defense budget tailwind (the Trump card):
- Trump’s team has floated a very aggressive defense path: a ~$1.01T national defense request for FY26, and then a proposal to take defense spending to $1.5T for 2027 (a massive jump vs recent toplines). -If even part of that growth materializes, primes and sub-primes get a multi-year demand runway. Boeing’s defense business is currently under-earning (more on that below), so a higher-volume environment can help… but only if execution and contract discipline improve. Bigger budget doesn’t automatically mean better margins. Thread continued below.
$ITABull